U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, under pressure from the federal courts and environmentalists, Wednesday declared the polar bear threatened because of loss of its sea ice habitat. But he also acted to make sure the move wouldn't trigger broader efforts aimed at tackling global warming.
In addition, Kempthorne said the government would propose an approach that appeared explicitly to be intended to allow oil development to go forward in the Arctic without interference. Oil and gas drilling had been cited by environmentalists as a threat to the bear but Kempthorne disagreed.
Environmental groups that had waged a multi-year battle to cover the animal under the Endangered Species Act offered strictly limited praise for the determination. They also issued none-too-veiled threats to continue litigating to beef up the protections. Activists had clearly hoped a listing could be employed in the broader fight against climate change and to provide more oversight over activities such as oil drilling (see Climate Law Update story here).
"We're going to challenge any attempt to improperly reduce protections for the polar bear," Kassie Siegel, a California attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, told Climate Law Update. The group was one of the organizations that had won a court ruling last month demanding the government make a final decision on listing the bear under the endangered species law by May 15 (see Climate Law Update story here). A hearing in the case was scheduled for Thursday in federal court in Oakland, California.
Late in the day, the environmental plaintiffs fired their first legal shot (see court filing here). They accused the government of dragging its feet so much that the listing would not actually meet the May 15 deadline because it couldn't be published in the Federal Register by then. They also took issue with other parts of the government's action, including its failure to include protections for the bears' "critical habitat."
Kempthorne made his announcement at a news conference in in Washington, D.C. (see press release here; text of Kempthorne statement here; access formal documents here). He cited the melting of the bear's icy habitat for his determination that the animal deserved protection under what he called "perhaps the least flexible law Congress has ever enacted." But Kempthorne added he was taking several administrative steps to "make certain the ESA isn't abused" to set policies to control global warming, such as controlling emissions from cars or power plants. That echoes a position taken by President Bush recently (see Climate Law Update story here).
Said Kempthorne:
"This decision may not be a popular decision; but I believe it is the right decision. I also believe it is right to put into place what tools I had available to me so we do not have the unintended consequences. We have seen that some have suggested that this will now be the opportunity to regulate greenhouse gases. It's not. This is not the tool."
A listing of threatened is second only to a classification of endangered under the law. The bear becomes the first mammal to be granted protection under the statute for reasons related to climate change.
Kempthorne's decision drew criticism both from environmentalists and their allies in Congress but also from conservative critics of climate change science.
Continue Reading...