In The News (July 1)

In The News (June 27)

Feds Touting Ways to Adapt to Climate Change

Adapting to climate change seems to be a big theme for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency these days.

For the second time this week, the agency has promoted a document that supports the notion of finding ways of living with a warming world. Just a day earlier, as reported by Climate Law Update, the EPA trumpeted a program to support studies of estuaries and how they might weather the new environment. Friday, it issued a 910-page tome based on studies of public resources such as national parks and forests suggesting management approaches to reducing "stressors" from climate change.

And, lo and behold, the agency concludes that some of the practices already followed to protect the resources, such as restoring vegetation along streams (such as the Iowa project pictured here), can also play a role in helping them coexist with climate change.

It's at least a somewhat hopeful take on what can be a pretty gloomy if not downright frightening prospect for the world. As recently as Thursday, the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, the government agency that also helped foster the new report, released another document that predicted a grim future of extreme weather featuring such wild variations as droughts and heavy downpours, excessive heat and intense hurricanes. All of that could become more commonplace "as humans continue to increase the atmospheric concentrations of heat-trapping gases," related an accompanying statement from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The public is looking for some answers, suggested George Gray, assistant administrator for the EPA's office of research and development in a press release announcing the newest report:

“People always say ’Don’t just tell us what will happen – tell us what we can do about it. By using the strategies outlined in this document, we can help managers protect our parks, rivers, and forests from possible future impacts of a changing climate.”

Continue Reading...

In Other News (June 20)

In Other News (June 19)

In Other News (June 17)

In Other News (June 6)

In Other News (June 2)

Bear's 'Threatened' Designation Generates Heat from Polar Opposites

As far as Climate Law Update knows, no one has yet polled the polar bears on the U.S. Interior Department's decision last week to list them as threatened under the Endangered Species Act. But lots of other interested parties seem less than enamored with the action, and they're looking toward the courts to do something -- albeit for quite different reasons.

The latest rip comes from the Pacific Legal Foundation, a California-based nonprofit law firm that generally champions legal principles from a conservative perspective and is often critical of how the endangered species law is applied. On Monday, one of its top lawyers said the organization was moving toward filing a lawsuit to undo what he called a "purposeless listing" that nevertheless carried with it a potential to create legal mischief for a broad range of industries. Last week, Pacific Legal had also criticized the move (see press release here).

Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne's action to put the bear on the list, largely for reasons having to do with the melting of its icy habitat, "will, we believe, open the door for litigious activists to challenge industry for carbon emissions to the atmosphere," Reed Hopper, a principal attorney for Pacific Legal, told Climate Law Update. Said Hopper, who is based in Washington state: 

"You can expect attacks on oil and gas and utilities and refineries and manufacturers, housing and the like. Ultimately, we think that's going to drive up substantially the cost of housing and food and transportation."

Hopper's warning comes just a few days after environmental groups themselves launched their own legal effort to strengthen the federal government's action. Chief among their objections were efforts by the interior secretary to limit the impact of the listing decision (see Climate Law Update story here; access government listing documents here).  

Continue Reading...

Enviros Strike Back on 'Deficient' Polar Bear Listing

Disgruntled environmental groups late Friday filed a flurry of new legal papers seeking to beef up what they characterized as the federal government's "legally deficient" protections for the polar bear announced earlier this week.

The organizations -- the same groups that successfully pressured the Bush administration to list the animal as "threatened" under the Endangered Species Act -- filed an updated federal court lawsuit, as well as other documents that could lead to even more legal claims in the future. 

The groups claimed the action by U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne "denied the species ... necessary protections." The documents were all filed in federal court in Oakland, California on Friday and included a letter sent a day earlier to Kempthorne outlining some of the organizations' objections (see text of lawsuit here; see additional notice to court here; see letter to Kempthorne here).  

Kempthorne, while making the polar bear the first mammal to be listed under the endangered species law for climate-related reasons, enraged activists by taking steps to prevent the listing from being used as a general weapon against global warming. One of his actions was to  issue a separate "interim" rule that appeared to be aimed at preventing the listing from interfering with oil and gas development in the Arctic (see Climate Law Update story here; see text of listing here; see special rule here). The rule also "purports to exempt all greenhouse gas emitting projects" from consideration under the section of the law at issue, the lawsuit charged. 

Continue Reading...

Federal Government Calls Polar Bear Threatened but Limits Impact

U.S. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne, under pressure from the federal courts and environmentalists, Wednesday declared the polar bear threatened because of loss of its sea ice habitat. But he also acted to make sure the move wouldn't trigger broader efforts aimed at tackling global warming.

In addition, Kempthorne said the government would propose an approach that appeared explicitly to be intended to allow oil development to go forward in the Arctic without interference. Oil and gas drilling had been cited by environmentalists as a threat to the bear but Kempthorne disagreed. 

Environmental groups that had waged a multi-year battle to cover the animal under the Endangered Species Act offered strictly limited praise for the determination. They also issued none-too-veiled threats to continue litigating to beef up the protections. Activists had clearly hoped a listing could be employed in the broader fight against climate change and to provide more oversight over activities such as oil drilling (see Climate Law Update story here). 

"We're going to challenge any attempt to improperly reduce protections for the polar bear," Kassie Siegel,  a California attorney for the Center for Biological Diversity, told Climate Law Update. The group was one of the organizations that had won a court ruling last month demanding the government make a final decision on listing the bear under the endangered species law by May 15 (see Climate Law Update story here). A hearing in the case was scheduled for Thursday in federal court in Oakland, California.

Late in the day, the environmental plaintiffs fired their first legal shot (see court filing here). They accused the government of dragging its feet so much that the listing would not actually meet the May 15 deadline because it couldn't be published in the Federal Register by then. They also took issue with other parts of the government's action, including its failure to include protections for the bears' "critical habitat."   

Kempthorne made his announcement at a news conference in in Washington, D.C. (see press release here; text of Kempthorne statement here; access formal documents here). He cited the melting of the bear's icy habitat for his determination that the animal deserved protection under what he called "perhaps the least flexible law Congress has ever enacted." But Kempthorne added he was taking several administrative steps to "make certain the ESA isn't abused" to set policies to control global warming, such as controlling emissions from cars or power plants. That echoes a position taken by President Bush recently (see Climate Law Update story here).

Said Kempthorne:

"This decision may not be a popular decision; but I believe it is the right decision. I also believe it is right to put into place what tools I had available to me so we do not have the unintended consequences. We have seen that some have suggested that this will now be the opportunity to regulate greenhouse gases. It's not. This is not the tool." 

A listing of threatened is second only to a classification of endangered under the law. The bear becomes the first mammal to be granted protection under the statute for reasons related to climate change.

Kempthorne's decision drew criticism both from environmentalists and their allies in Congress but also from conservative critics of climate change science.

Continue Reading...