In The News (August 27)

Court: Texas Wind Farm Aesthetics Not a 'Nuisance'

Texas state appeals court the other day upheld a ruling dismissing a nuisance lawsuit filed by property owners unhappy with a big wind farm, holding that unwelcome "aesthetical impact" doesn't support  such a claim.

The plaintiffs had complained that the Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center reduced both the scenic beauty of their area and their enjoyment of their property. According to the court's 10-page opinion, they had conceded they couldn't base their case simply on disliking the wind farm. They argued, however, that aesthetics could be considered as one of the conditions that creates a nuisance. Jurors, they contended, were entitled to consider the farm's "visual impact" along with descriptions of the towers' blinking lights, their flickering shadows and noise.

But FPL Energy, which owns and operates the 421-turbine farm through a subsidiary, successfully argued that no Texas court had ever recognized a nuisance claim based on aesthetics. Beauty, the company maintained, is "necessarily subjective." It argued that "giving someone an aesthetic veto over a neighbor's use of his land would be a recipe for legal chaos," according to the opinion.

Justice Rick Strange, who wrote the ruling for a unanimous three-judge panel, determined that the plaintiffs' "emotional response" to the loss of their view was at the foundation of their case -- and he concluded that didn't fly legally. However, he seemed to empathize with them:

"Unobstructed sunsets, panoramic landscapes, and starlit skies have inspired countless artists and authors and have brought great pleasure to those fortunate enough to live in scenic rural settings. The loss of this view has undoubtedly impacted plaintiffs".

Strange found  that the state's courts have balanced competing interests by limiting nuisance actions based on lawful activity "to instances in which the activity results in some invasion of the plaintiff's property and by not allowing recovery for emotional reaction alone." He continued:

Altering this balance by recognizing a new cause of action for aesthetical impact causing an emotional injury is beyond the purview of an intermediate appellate court. Alternatively, allowing plaintiffs to include aesthetics as a condition in connection with other forms of interference is a distinction without a difference. Aesthetical impact either is or is not a substantial interference with the use and enjoyment of land. If a jury can consider aesthetics as a condition, then it can find nuisance because of aesthetics. Because Texas law does not provide a nuisance action for aesthetical impact, the trial court did not err by granting FPL's motion for partial summary judgment and by instructing the jury to exclude from its consideration the aesthetical impact of the wind farm.
   

 

The case comes out of a state that is among the nation's leaders in wind generation, and is likely to face much more development, if people like T. Boone Pickens have their way. This week's state ruling wasn't even the only court decision this month favorable to a Texas wind farm project in a case in which aesthetics was raised.

Aspects of renewable energy projects are also facing some opposition from environmental groups elsewhere, as Climate Law Update has noted before, for a variety of reasons. Solar projects as well are facing scrutiny, including a major federal effort to assess their environmental impacts on public lands.

But as Environmental Capital, the Wall Street Journal's environmental blog, which wrote about the FPL case this week, put it: "Among all the other hurdles facing renewable energy, from economics to technology, will the real bogeyman be aesthetics?" EC noted other locations where similar objections have been raised, and it cited the American Wind Energy Association, which has characterized a turbine about 1,000 feet away as approximately as loud as a refrigerator. 

In talking to a local reporter, one of the plaintiffs cited money and politics as behind the losses suffered by wind power critics. The combination "would prevent anything from being a negative with wind energy in the state of Texas," plaintiff Patricia LaPoint told the Abilene Reporter-News.

FPL itself had little to say about the case. In an e-mail to Climate Law Update, company spokesman Steve Stengel said only: "We're obviously pleased with the decision and think the court got it right."  

--Dennis Pfaff of Thelen 

 

Mr. Pickens Goes to Washington

T. Boone Pickens, the Texas oil-man-turned-wind-entrepeneur, visited with lawmakers in Washington Tuesday to urge quick action on subjects such as assuring adequate transmission capabilities to move vast amounts of renewable energy around the landscape.

Even in Texas, where he wants to build the world's largest wind project, Pickens (pictured) said in testimony before the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee that he doesn't have the luxury of waiting for state officials to finish adopting policies to facilitate the needed lines:

"I am 80 years old, and I don't I don’t have time to wait for the process to be completed, and neither does this country. I am building my own transmission line, which will ultimately travel 250 miles in Texas from the top of the Panhandle to near the Dallas/Fort Worth area, and I will have to pay for this transmission line myself. Not very many wind developers are in a position to do this."

Pickens, the chairman and CEO of BP Capital, has developed what is called the Pickens Plan. It  generally centers on harnessing renewable sources such as wind power to generate electricity, and shifting natural gas -- now used to produce about 22 percent of electrical power -- to use as a transportation fuel. In a statement released in conjunction with his testimony before the Senate panel, Pickens also proposed five "Pickens Principles" to be used in evaluating energy plans:

  • The plan has to slash the country's dependence on foreign oil by at least 30 percent in 10 years
  • The plan needs to rely on 100 percent American resources
  • The plan needs to utilize existing, proven and workable alternatives to foreign oil
  • The plan needs to call on private enterprise to execute quickly
  • The plan requires the federal government to clear the path for implementation.

Pickens told the Senate committee that any solution intended to help rescue the country from the "crisis" due to its dependence on imported oil "will require action by the Congress to promote private investment in our electric transmissions system." He said the country is on course to import $700 billion worth of oil from overseas annually -- an amount quadruple the cost of the Iraq war.

Transmission capacity has proven to be one of the more controversial areas for new renewable generation, as Climate Law Update has noted before.  

Among his proposals: Congress should amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to speed up, in some circumstances, the designation of electricity transmission corridors in which the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has final authority to approve lines; give FERC exclusive jurisdiction in some case for new transmission for renewable projects; allow costs to be spread over multiple states; streamline the process for approving transmission lines on federal lands, as well as the issuance of other federal permits, and give transmission line builders "preferred access" to the transmission capacity. On that latter point, Pickens said:

"If I put several billion dollars at risk, which I expect to do with my project, it does not strike me as fair that someone else can show up after everything is built, and all of the risks have been taken, and ask for and receive the right to use the transmission line that I paid for and force me to curtail transmission of my own electricity to permit them to use the transmission line."

Pickens also advocated extension of production tax credits for wind and other renewable projects, which have been bogged down in Congress, as Climate Law Update has reported. In addition, he said there should be "targeted incentives" for transmission lines, such as a loan guarantee program that surfaced at one time in the Senate. Long distance transmission projects  for renewable energy should also qualify for an investment tax credit, he said.

Pickens seemed to get a warm reception from the committee's chairman, Sen. Joseph Lieberman, a Connecticut Independent who has sponsored his own anti-global warming legislation. Said Lieberman:

"The time for incremental steps is over, and I for one am spoiling for bold action.”

But not everyone embraced Pickens' remarks. Gal Luft, executive director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, a think tank, said the notion of that natural gas is a viable alternative to gasoline for transportation is a "spectacularly bad idea," according to CNN-Money. Luft said more than 60 percent of the world's natural gas reserves are under the control of Russia, Iran, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.

--Dennis Pfaff

(Photo: Wikipedia)

In Other News (June 18)